Previously on 24, I swore I’d be through with the show if Tony’s dead for real. Mikey died saving the Goondocks. President Logan was a wuss. DHS decided to take over CTU and fire everyone, which will happen in this episode or something. I don’t care anymore.
Tonight, graphic violence. Unfortunately, this season, that tends to mean that one of our favorite characters gets offed very unceremoniously. So boo to graphic violence. I no longer heart the graphic violence warning.
So. 8 p.m. Tony’s dead for real. I’m sooo done with this show. Done for good.
Not going to watch it.
Nor blog it.
Can’t. Stop. Bad. Addiction. Hate. Surnow. Angry. SarahK. Must. Stop…
Archive of entries posted on 20th March 2006
Cindy Sheehan Images Censored
Michelle Malkin reports that AL JAZEERA CENSORS CINDY SHEEHAN.
Whoops, looks we’re censoring her as well. I think we did better. Much less offensive.
Review: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
I watched Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
My Review:
Continue reading ‘Review: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire’ »
New Offensive Religious Cartoon Challenge!
With the controversy over the South Park Scientology episode (said episode can be found here and actually isn’t that vulgar for a South Park), wouldn’t it be a lot more fun to challenge cartoonists to depict the evil alien warlord Xenu than boring old Mohammed (here’s a still of the South Park depiction)? While that most likely won’t get you targeted for a beheading, it’s not unlikely you’ll get sued.
I’ll have my own drawing up later this week.
BTW, I though it was hilarious how at the end the South Park episode, Tom Cruise yells, “I’ll sue you in England!” and then that’s what he did in real life (they can’t show the episode there).
The Code of the Da Vinci Code: A Thriller
The Code of the Da Vinci Code
A thriller from RightWingDuck.
Dr. R.W. Duck, a world renowned expert in the field of blogology, is about to have his world turned upside down, sideways, and upside down again: meaning everything will turn rightside up but still end up sideways. When an investigator turns up asking him to solve a riddle that will decimate millions of devout atheists: Did Dan Brown steal the ideas for the Da Vinci Code from another couple of whack jobs – or were the theories his own? This fast paced thriller will thrill you right down to your thrilling genes, which if you’re young you probably wear down around your hips with your underwear showing. Read the Code of the Da Vinci Code and you’ll experience a thriller the likes of which you haven’t seen since Frank J. And Sarah K. let their new sixty pound dog loose in a cage with two baby kittens.
Read what the blog critics are saying about the Code of the Da Vinci Code.
“Shut up and post something already!” Frank J.
“Does it have a scene with lap dancing? Every thriller needs lap dancing.” Harvey
“No Lap dancing. This is a family website. At least – most of the time it’s a family website.” Sarah K.
“Whatchu all guys talking about?” Spacemonkey.
“Shut up and post something, Spacemonkey.” Frank J. again.
Chapter 1: The First Chapter
Continue reading ‘The Code of the Da Vinci Code: A Thriller’ »
Dr. Huh?
The new Dr. Who series appeared on SciFi this weekend and…
Well, it’s not exactly new considering that not only has it been on BBC for almost a year, but diehard fans could easily get bitorrent bootleg copies to view not only this episode, but the season in its entirety.
What always amused me about Dr. Who is the fact that the TARDIS appears as a police box in order to blend in, but it can’t change from that shape because of a blown chameleon circuit.
If you were making an Americanized Dr. Who, would it appear as a Starbucks or a Portapottie?
We Need Some Sort of Law to Shut Up Those People Complaining About Their Speech Being Opressed
An Editorial by Frank J.
Running a fascist state is harder than you think; in fact, most fascist states fail within the first decade. That’s why I feel it important to point out obvious failings of the new fascist America to help keep it healthy and oppressive. The most blatant (and loud) problem right now is the improper silencing of dissenters.
Honestly, my only experience with fascism is voting for Bush twice, but here is what I’ve observed. Obviously, speech is being oppressed, because we are constantly (and annoyingly) being told by liberals that their rights are being taken away and that dissent is being treated as treason. That might seem like a good start, but the problem is that people shouldn’t explicitly be able to say that they’re being oppressed. Everyone should know that already, and any who complains about it should be jailed or rounded up into camps for speaking out against the state. It’s really a huge rookie fascist state mistake not to do that. While curtailing civil liberties is a must, it is also crucial to quiet those who complain about that.
” If I were a BusHitler, I’d disappear a few dissenters without admitting to it publicly.”
I know, you’re probably wondering, “If we quiet everyone who complains about out fascist evil, how will anyone know what’s being oppressed and thus what not to do?” That’s a good question. If I were a BusHitler, I’d disappear a few dissenters without admitting to it publicly. Then, people will whisper about it and be scared. Yes, you could be more explicit about it, but, not admitting to your oppressive actions makes your state that much more mysterious and feared. If people aren’t sure what evil oppression you are doing, it makes them that much more likely to fall into line since they can’t even comprehend the menace they are up against. That’s some strong fascism right there.
The other question comes up is whether dissenters should be jailed or put into reeducation camps. In some ways, that’s more a budgetary concern because camps can be more costly that just throwing someone in a dank hole and feeding him bread and water once a day. It’s best to judge that on a person by person basis, though. For instance, you may really want to throw Cindy Sheehan in a dank hole, but since she’s already so public, reeducation might work better. Actually, looking at Cindy’s mental acuity, all I think it would take is a lunch break to brainwash her into saying how much she loves her son’s sacrifice – and you’d still probably have time to finish off a tuna fish sandwich before going back out to crack the skulls of those who don’t love The Government.
Don’t forget to shutdown websites critical of The Government as well. Again, here is a good place to instill some fear. First, take down The Democratic Underground and DailyKos, putting up some blatant lies that they failed to pay to renew their URLs and have been bought by The Government. Also, make sure to disappear anyone involved with those sites you can hunt down. This will be a very conspicuous taking out of those who speak ill of the new fascism while denying anything was done. Again, this will cause more fear to shut up the rest.
Yes, fascism is hard, but I think I outlined a few simple steps to make things easier. And, though this itself could be seen as criticizing The Government, please don’t secretly arrest me. Then again, you have to start somewhere.
Frank J. is a syndicated columnist whose columns appear worldwide on IMAO.us and is a frequent contributor to IMAOPodcast.com. He is also the author of such books as “Patriotism for Dummies” and “I Unconditionally Love Our Government and You Should Too (If You Know What’s Good for You)”.
McCain Is Not Funny
I meant to post this earlier, but John Hawkins had his conservative case against McCain.
Me, the issue is much simpler: I just can’t imagine a series on In My Worlds™ starring him.
Also, like spacemonkey, I’ve never forgiven McCain for killing McAbel.
OT, Hawkins has his review of V for Vendetta up, a film I was a bit curious about.
Informal Impeachment Poll
There is more talk of impeaching Bush lately. I’d like everyone to say whether they are for the impeachment of George W. Bush in the comments, but please first read the pros and cons on the subject:
PROS:
* President Bush is still unapologetically President Bush. :: looks to the sky and shakes fist :: Buuuuuuush!
* The impeachment process would slow down Congress from passing new spending bills.
* I’m kinda bored, and it’s something to do.
CONS:
* Everyone confuses impeachment with being thrown out of office, and what’s the point of impeachment if no one is going to understand it?
* We already did one last presidency, and we don’t want America to look like a one-trick pony.
* The Kossaks will constantly be peeing their pants in glee, and I don’t want to smell that.
So, what do you think?