Most politicians seem to be lawyers. I don’t know how that happened, but it’s horrible. Basically, we have lawyers coming up with laws that only other lawyers can understand, keeping themselves employed. None of them ever create anything useful; they just sort of get in the way of and put rules on other people doing useful stuff.
So it would be nice to have politicians come from different occupations, and here’s an editorial saying we should have scientists become politicians.
Horrible idea.
I don’t know if you’ve ever dealt with the output of scientists, but it’s a lot of crap you have to slog through before you find anything of practical application. I mean, the solution to lawyers isn’t people who deal even more in the theoretical. We don’t need people saying, “My new plan is MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN to help the economy.” Then after they implement the plan and everything collapses they’ll be like, “Whoops. I guess we forgot to factor in a couple parameters. Well, NOW it should work.”
Instead, engineers would make good politicians. With engineers, crap has to work at the end of the day. We don’t care if it’s theoretically pretty or what not. Of course, you run into the same problem you always have with why people from useful occupations don’t become politicians: Too busy doing useful stuff. Who can just drop everything and run for office? Mainly lawyers, because they weren’t doing anything useful anyway. I think the only way you’ll get people with useful experience in government is if you start drafting them like with jury duty. I’d certainly rather try random names from the phonebook than who we have now.
Like this:
Like Loading...