Harvey is reposting our podcasts (can you believe that was done more than five years ago?). Definitely check it out if you’ve never heard it before… and even if you have because it’s been like five years and I don’t even remember any of it. They were pretty funny… just also a lot of work.

Now I have the Chairman Mao song stuck in my head…

Following up on my post yesterday asking which of the two political parties is really racist, I now ask which of the two parties do you think is most sexist? A Tennessee Democrat Rep. Janis Baird Sontany remarked about Republican woman, “You have to lift their skirts to find out if they are women. You sure can’t find out by how they vote.” Similarly, a number of people have been asking if all the Republican women who won the primary last week is a blow to feminism because they don’t have the “right views.”

See, in the minds of Democrats, only white males are allowed to have any viewpoint they want without having their authenticity questioned. Women have to have certain views or they’re not real women. Similarly, if you’re black you have to have certain viewpoints on tax issues or your not a real black person and if you’re Hispanic a nice white liberal will tell you what viewpoint you should have if you want to be an authentic Hispanic. As for Asians… well, just look at the bile Michelle Malkin gets.

Republicans, on the other hand, are enlightened and think women and minorities can have whatever views they want and we won’t attack the authenticity of your race or gender. We might call you a hippie and punch you, but that’s not a race issue — that’s a hippie issue. Republicans aren’t racist or sexist, while the Democrats only exist because of racism (I wrote about that some time ago for Pajamas Media). The only way their party can exist is keeping people in racial groups and not independently examining the issues. That’s why they’re always trying to awkwardly inject race into everything (Against Obamacare? Racist! Don’t like soccer? Also racist!). With all the racism they spread, they’re like the KKK, except more effective and with more taxes.

So Obama sent out a fundraising e-mail about the oil spill. So how does that work?

“I have no idea what I’m doing, but maybe I’ll figure it out if you send me money. Why, with your contribution of $50, you can help lead me down the path to figuring out whose ass to kick.”

Anyway, the letter outlines a bunch of new policy ideas Obama wants to use the oil spill as impetus to as he doesn’t want to let a crisis go to waste, but does that really work when people see you as part of the reason of the crisis? Like he goes on about how we need clean energy because of how awful oil is, but of course oil looks awful when you have a president who just twiddles his thumbs while it’s gushing out into all the ocean. Basically, the oil spill has demonstrated Obama doesn’t know how to do anything useful or competent, so why is his bumbling of this big disaster going to convince us to follow anymore of his ideas? The only proposal he could have that I would see catching on with the public would be for him to say he’ll now sit quietly in the corner while other people handling the important things.

In my latest Pajamas Media Column, I talk about how Obama failing as president is really our fault and explain how we can do something about it.