Welfare Recipients Launch Objection to Terms “Welfare” and “Recipients” — So State Cancels Both

Not the terms — the welfare, and the recipients.

Well, one can dream, can’t one?

There’s no such thing as a free launch.

Promoted Comment (From Another Site)

I liked this analysis: Has nothing to do with Budweiser, Disney, Fox News, Kennedys, Windsors, etc.

The first generation heir gets 50% of the founder’s genes. The first generation heir also grew up while the company was being built and saw with its own eyes what it took to go from nothing to something great.

The second generation heir gets 25% of the founder’s genes. The second generation might have known the founder and depending on the relationship of the first generation to the founder might have valued what the founder created. Some second generation heirs carry on the family business, particularly if blessed with a first generation heir parent who was hard working and contributed to the development of the business.

The third generation heir receives 12.5% of the founder’s genes. Almost certainly the third generation did not know the founder and therefore has no direct knowledge of what it took to create the lifestyle the third generation enjoyed.

By the fourth generation the founder’s gene pool has mostly played out (6.25%) in terms of determining the intelligence, creativity and work ethic of the person. In addition by the fourth generation there have been three successive generations that have not had to worry about missing a meal and have been born and raised in luxury. Add to that indulgent child rearing and you have a receipe for failure.

Rarely do dynasties last to or past the fourth generation. By the fourth generation there may be 100 or more heirs, and the monthly allowances from the family trust are becoming too small to support the self-indulgent lifestyles of the many non-working trust fund babies. Often the unproductive heirs find an attorney and friendly court to help them bust the trust, liquidate the assets and give out equal shares of the assets. They then squander the cash raised by selling the business leaving the next generation, or their grandchildren to learn again the value of hard work and the motivation of hunger.

Glad we never had nothing! This sounds like slow torture.

Straight Line of the Day: They Say That If You Hold an Empty Bud Light Can Up to Your Ear, You Can Hear…

Welcome to IMAO! All That’s Missing Are the Cartoon Thought Bubbles Leading to the Painting

SI Swimsuit Madness

Hi everyone. We continue on with the tournament and today we start with the Second Chance bracket. Losers from the first get another opportunity to maybe get to the final. This week is a little bit different as it will last two weeks with the next matches not starting until May 31st. Providing Walrus makes it back from Denver in time to help set up. In the mean time here are the results from last week’s matches and the new ones. Enjoy.

Winners

Anna Kournakova 94 Defeats Bianca Balti 61

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
68 votes

Bo Brsmanovic 110 Defeats Brooks Nader 40

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
68 votes

This week’s matches

Match 37

Abby Dahlkemper vs Allie Ayers

Abby Dahlkemper

  • Round 1 Match 1 Lost to Alana Blanchard 175-74
Abby Dahlkemper

VS

Allie Ayers

  • Round 1 Match 2 Lost to Alex Morgan 171-64
Allie Ayers

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
80 votes

Match 38

Ally Kendricks vs Ana Ivanovic

Ally Kendricks

  • Round 1 Match 3 Lost to Aly Raisman 124-65

VS

Ana Ivanovic

  • Round 1 Match 4 Lost to Alyssa Miller 130-67

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
77 votes