Working on a Metaphor, Here

Media: Pepé Le Pew, amorously following

Kamala Harris: A cute puss with a “presidential” stripe accidentally down her back

.

Despite Wall-To-Wall Media Propaganda To Protect Kamala’s Incompetence, Voters Are Onto Her
Federalist | September 02, 2024 | Hayden Daniel

The media have developed a pathological obsession with shielding Vice President Kamala Harris from any criticism or inconvenient fact…

In 2021, the media reported that Harris played a critical role in Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. Politico stated that Harris “was the last person in the room” before Biden made the decision to pull out. The Washington Post characterized Harris as “as a vice president deeply involved in key moments.” The Los Angeles Times noted that Harris was “front and center as President Biden has overseen America’s retreat from Afghanistan.”

Yet the media screeched in unison when former President Donald Trump correctly identified Biden and Harris as the primary culprits behind the debacle that resulted in the deaths of 13 American servicemembers. Now the media is trying desperately to separate (Vice President!) Harris from Biden’s administration entirely, with outlets firing out patently ridiculous headlines like Politico’s doozy: “Vance tries to tether Harris to Biden during Michigan rally.”

One of the more egregious examples came from The Washington Post on Tuesday. The outlet attempted to “prove” that Biden’s disastrous tenure will in no way negatively affect Harris’ electoral prospects with a nifty little graph. “The GOP is trying hard to tie Harris more closely to Biden on the economy, immigration and the border,” Washington Post Senior Political Reporter Aaron Blake claimed. “One big problem: Americans don’t think she played a particularly central role.”

Blake included a graph taken from his article (headlined “Why Biden isn’t dragging down Harris”) that showed that only 11 percent of Americans believe Harris has had a “great deal of influence” on Biden’s economic policy. Likewise, only 15 percent said that she has a “great deal of influence” on immigration policy despite, as Blake notes, “the ‘border czar’ stuff.”

.

Not to be confused with:

.

Vile E. Mediacrities vs. the Frontrunner:

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.