Unquestionably the malevolent personification of all mankind’s crimes against our planet.
Simon Legree, movie critic for the San Francisco Daily Evening, said that Toy Story 4 posed a “subversive threat” under the guise of children’s entertainment.
“There’s a lot of things wrong with this movie,” Legree said. “First, they went and rated it ‘G’. Who does that in this day and age? It’s supposed to mean it’s safe, but what it really means is that it doesn’t speak a single word of truth to power. It means that it’s an unquestioning tool of societal norms and conventions. Plus, Forky – like the other two main protagonists – is white. Way to toot the racist dog-whistle, Pixar.”
“But that’s not the worst of it,” said Legree. “Here in California, we’ve done a lot of work to stop the deadly plague of plastic straws, or ‘murder tubes‘ as we call them – that kill thousands of people every year with their insidious plasticity. Fortunately, we’ve been able to make a lot of progress in that realm. Most of the forward-thinking people I know just refer to them as ‘the s-word’ now.”
“But it’s not so much the plasticality of Forky as it is the disposability, and that’s what Pixar blatantly glosses over. Instead of being portrayed as an unnatural abomination made of man’s most environmentally deadly material, this disposable piece of pernicious filth is treated like a fun, harmless toy. A TOY! A plastic spork isn’t a TOY! It’s a misbegotten atrocity of man’s technological reach outreaching his sustainable grasp! It’s a nightmare! An outrage! A primeval Lovecraftian horror of doom and madness! Also the tines aren’t very long so it’s hard to eat a salad with one.”
In states where laws are more s-word friendly, however, the opposition to Toy Story 4 tends to be somewhat less strident, with some reviewers actually going so far as to recommend the movie, despite its message of irresponsible profligate mass-consumerism and subtextual promotion of human convenience over environmental responsibility.
Henry Rearden, an online movie reviewer based in Plano, TX, offered his take.
“Yeah, I read Simple Simon’s review,” Rearden said. “He’s a progressive ogre who hates fun like Dracula hates beach volleyball. In 2010, he totally trashed Toy Story 3 because Woody & company got rescued instead of recycled. Anyway, go see Toy Story 4. But only if you like smiling, laughing, and having your heart warmed.”
“As for Simple’s ‘racist dog-whistle’ crack,” added Rearden, “seems to me that if you’re hearing dog whistles, it likely means that you’re the dog. In this case, probably Cujo.”
—–
< Bill de Blasio: “Glad Fourth Of July Is Over So We Can All Be Normal Again Instead Of Patriotic”
He He…he said “Spork”. He He…
The irrational loon Simon Legree(d) apparently misses out on the fact the many of the toys in the ‘Toy Story’ series are made of plastic or contain plastic parts. Way to go overboard, Legree(d).
“seems to me that if you’re hearing dog whistles, it likely means that you’re the dog.”
Bravo, sir. Bravo!
You’d think plastic came from another planet. But it is natural to this planet, like everything else here. We use things as tools, just like crows and ants, we are just better at it. The left tries to act like humans are unnatural. We are completely natural and everything we do is natural. Leftists who think they can force humans back into the Stone Age are in for a surprise.
Plastic is only evil if it’s used as a convenience and then you throw it away so that you don’t have to waste water, energy, and time cleaning it. It’s almost as though what liberals REALLY hate is that something is making your life ever so slightly better….
But nobody’s THAT petty and sadistic…
Well all people will return to the stone age, just not them. The enlightened will enjoy special status and privileges because they are… special.
Liberals rage against capitalism, but enjoy all its benefits.
Liberals rail against production, but use all its products.
Liberals want to ban weapons, but enjoy all their protection.
Liberals cry about the West, but use all modern conveniences.
Henry David Thoreau extolled going back to nature, but did so all on a wealthy friend’s land.
I saw the trailer, I took it that the spork was meant to subliminally confuse the concept of gender identity on young children. It is not a spoon or a fork…it is a “gender fluid” character trying to “find itself”. There are several others in this film, but the main “push” appears to be to use immaturity and insecurity to disrupt a kids basic sense of reality while they are most impressionable.
Adults and kids alike are subjected to this underhanded form of “low tone” impressionism non-stop these days. Hollywood stopped catering to fans and popularity many many years ago in favor of liberal propaganda and ideology wherever and whenever possible.
Personally, I believe there is a process in place out there that reviews film plans and offers money to producers to alter and infuse this mental sickness into their work for mass public consumption.
It is nice to hear that Lib’s are attacking their own psy-ops!!
Pingback: Moonbattery Habitat for Hypocrisy - Moonbattery